Massengeschmack-TV Shop

Politischer Smalltalk 2.0


#8334

Ich hab noch nicht mal geschummelt, das Ergebnis ist echt :smiley:


#8335

grafik

:joy:


#8336

so ein Schwachsinn! :angry: :joy:


#8337

Sehe ich genauso, empfinde es aber trotzdem als knuffig. Wenn wir dann demnĂ€chst mal wieder aneinander geraten, weiß ich ja warum :wink:


#8338

Hmm, hast du alles mit doppelter Ablehnung beantwortet? Auch die Frage, ob Monarchisten und Adel ihre Privilegien behalten sollen? Ich bin mir nĂ€mlich nicht sicher, ob man wirklich alles mit doppelte Zustimmung beantworten mĂŒsste fĂŒr 100 %, aber freilich das meiste.


#8339

Möglicherweise habe ich ja die Fragen falsch verstanden, allerdings komme ich (nicht völlig unerwartet) auf

Meine Antworten:

  • Any sexual practice which involves only consenting adults should be legal, including prostitution. (Agree+)
  • All forms of monarchy and nobility should be abolished, or at least stripped of all special privileges. (Agree+)
  • Gambling should be legal and any private business should be able to open a gambling or bookmaking service. (Disagree)
  • Endangered species like tigers, rhinos, and elephants, that are threatened because people want their bones and tusks, should be allowed to be commercialized and farmed like livestock. (Neutral)
  • Health care is not a right or a service that the government owes its citizens. (Disagree-)
  • All drugs should be legal. (Neutral)
  • The government should never be allowed to use torture or “enhanced interrogation techniques” under any circumstances. (Agree+)
  • Suicide and medically assisted suicide should be legal. (Disagree)
  • Free speech is no more fundamental to a free society than the right to private property. (Disagree-)
  • Any individual with a driver’s license and a car should be able to offer taxi services to strangers if that is what he wants. (Disagree)
  • If the government got out of everything but the police, the courts, and the military, we’d be closer to my ideal society. (Disagree-)
  • People with no criminal record should be allowed to own guns. (Disagree)
  • If people want to drive without a seat belt, that should be their decision. (Disagree)
    . The government has no business funding, running, or supporting any type of media outlet (TV station, newspaper, radio station etc.). (Disagree)
  • The state should not grant special privileges for straight marriages over gay ones. (Agree+)
  • Property rights should be entitled to the same protection as other human rights. (Disagree-)
  • People who are exposed to pollution or loud noises should ideally be entitled to compensation from the perpetrator. (Agree)
  • Privately owned bars and clubs should be allowed to discriminate admittance on the basis of gender, race, or sexual orientation if that is what the owner wants. (Agree)
  • If the owner of a private firm wants to hire only people of a certain gender, race, or religion to work in that firm, that should be his choice. (Agree)
  • Abolish all energy subsidies - both coal/oil and wind/solar. (Disagree-)
  • Trade involving human organs (heart, liver, kidneys, etc.) for organ transplantation should be legal as long as it involves only consenting adults. (Disagree-)
  • A person who resists a military draft in peacetime is acting in self-defense. (Agree)
  • Pharmaceutical companies should be allowed to sell experimental and unapproved drugs to consumers as long as they are clearly marked as such. (Agree)
  • The state should not be allowed to privilege some religions over others. In fact, the state shouldn’t concern itself with religion at all. (Disagree-)
  • The government has no business dictating a minimum wage. (Disagree-)
  • It is not the government’s job to ensure affordable housing. (Disagree)
  • Provided that there is a government, if that government needs a service rendered (such as postal or transportation services), it should solicit private contractors to do the job. (Disagree)
  • State-sanctioned medical licensing (for doctors, psychologists, etc.) should be abolished. (Disagree)
  • Private firms should be allowed to issue their own currencies. (Disagree)
  • Political parties shouldn’t be eligible for any kind of tax money or government support other than what their members are willing to pay them. (Disagree)
  • Only individuals can have rights. There should be no such thing as collective rights, minority rights, or rights based on race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation. (Neutral)
  • As long as specific individuals are not named or threatened, hate speech directed at racial, sexual, or political minorities should be legal. (Disagree)
  • Businesses and banks that are deemed “too big to fail” should nevertheless be allowed to fail if they can’t raise the money they need from private investors - they certainly shouldn’t get government handouts. (Disagree)
  • Labor unions should be criminally prosecuted for forcefully blockading workplaces or disrupting the work of non-union workers. (Neutral)

Die Antwortmöglichkeiten habe ich so verstanden:
Agree+: In jedem Fall
Agree: Unter gewissen UmstĂ€nden dafĂŒr
Neutral: Keine Meinung
Disagree: Unter gewissen UmstÀnden dagegen
Disagree-: In jedem Fall dagegen

Edit: Uff, eine Frage definitiv falsch versatdnen: The state should not be allowed to privilege some religions over others. In fact, the state shouldn’t concern itself with religion at all. (Agree+)

Ich bin ein klarer BefĂŒrworter eines sakulĂ€ren Staatswesens



#8340

Ich habe vergessen einen Screenshot zu machen, mein Ergebnis war 17%. Kann den Test nicht wirklich ernst nehmen.


#8341

Dass du trotz denen bei 0% landest ist
 seltsam


#8342

Mit Ausnahme des ersten Punktes wirkt das alles auf mich ein wenig wie belangloses FĂŒllmaterial.

Welcher freiheitsliebende Demokrat (ganz gleich mit welchem Wirtschaftssystem im Hinterkopf) wird dem Staat Folterrechte oder dem Adel Sonderrechte zugestehen?


#8343

es sind definitiv freiheitliche Standpunkte, insofern ja, es scheint FĂŒllmaterial zu sein, was den Test bei 34 Fragen ja vollkommen unnötig aufblĂ€ht.

edit: oder es gibt ne Marktfreiheitsschwelle, bei der persönliche Freiheit erst ab einer bestimmten Zustimmungsquote bei Marktfreiheit hinzugezĂ€hlt wird, um “Linksliberale” auszufiltern
 Aber so kompliziert ist es glaube ich nicht^^


#8344

Bisher habe ich mich immer als eher Liberal gesehen. Seit dem Test weiß ich, dass ich zumindest kein LibertĂ€rer bin. 0 %. Dass ich da auf dem gleichen Level bin wie unser Bombenleger Scumdog stimmt mich allerdings bedenklich
 :grin:


#8345

Always stay classy with my zwangsgebĂŒhren


#8346

Ganz ruhig - das ist nur, weil es da keine negativen Werte gibt :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:


#8347

Aber Bedenke: Hitler hÀtte auch Negative Werte in diesem Test.


#8348

#8349

Hitler war ja auch Sozialist :stuck_out_tongue:


#8350

Ich leg nen Film ein, ich seh euch dann 200 Posts weiter.


#8351

Dann zur Abwechslung mal etwas Sport. :slightly_smiling_face:


#8352

Unsinn, NatĂŒrlich haben wir Meinungsfreiheit. Jeder kann alles sagen, was er will. Nur muss er halt mit den Konsequenzen leben (z.B. Pranger, Wohnungsentglasung, schwere Kopfverletzung). :roll_eyes:


#8353

Ich verstehe was er meint, aber:

“Man darf es nicht sagen”
“Da wird dir was vorgeworfen”

sind fĂŒr ihn synonym, es ist aber schlichtweg falsch. Das einzige was heute fehlt, sind die Eier, eine nicht mainstreamtaugliche Meinung zu vertreten. Du darfst eben alles sagen, heul nur nicht rum, wenn es Backlash gibt (verbal), sondern argumentiere.

Dieses Geheule kann ich echt nicht mehr hören.